33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives on the police is usually to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, guarantee regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair to the offender as well as the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other Courts, but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
Case law is specific on the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. For instance, a ruling in the California appellate court would not normally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair for the offender as well as Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
Also, it may well review an appeal of the decision for which it has granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by The brand new Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts When the Commission cannot achieve a decision.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of your laws, the legal system adheres to your doctrine of stare decisis
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were instructed of your boy’s past, they asked if their children were Safe and sound with him in their home. The therapist confident them that that they had nothing at all to fret about.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons getting their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is really a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to perform away with the candidature on the petitioner. Read more
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of your boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, plus the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf with the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court to get a dismissal based on absolute immunity, since they were all performing in their Work with DCFS.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated above. However no harassment shall be caused to either party and also the case shall be decided with the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more
10. Based to the findings of your inquiry committee, this petition isn't thought of maintainable and it is therefore liable to get dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a nicely-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence click here and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.